Jurassic National Monument and San Rafael Swell Conservation Area

Jackson

I like to go outside.
.
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
2,396
Has anyone heard much about this?

https://www.ksl.com/?sid=46317537&n...nal-monument-wilderness-areas-in-central-utah

Not sure what to to make of it. I'm tired of these designations putting certain areas on everyone's radar, but I guess a lot of the Swell remains fairly inaccessible regardless. I alsp can't help but wonder if there's an ulterior motive, although I do like that it involves some wilderness designations.
 

wsp_scott

Member
Joined
May 16, 2016
Messages
844
Reading that makes me even more confused about Utah politics and public lands, I thought UT politicians hated Wilderness and Monument designations or at least that is the impression following the Bear Ears fiasco :)
 

ramblinman

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
100
"The bill also would transfer nearly 100,000 acres to the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration. The agency manages the various parcels of state-owned lands throughout Utah as part of a trust to support various institutions in the state, including public schools."

That's why they are supporting it, they are trying to use this deal to get land back from the federal government. My understanding is that lands that are part of this state trust are used for extraction with the proceeds going to the state school system. It's hard to read the color coded map at the end of the article, but to me it looks like this proposal puts a huge chunk of the San Rafael Desert on the chopping block, opened up for mining/drilling.

Also, it's worth noting that proposed wilderness areas for the San Rafael Desert portion would all border this state owned extraction site. In other words the mineral extraction wouldn't be quarantined in some isolated area, it would be right smack in the middle of the surrounding wilderness.
 
Last edited:

IntrepidXJ

ADVENTR
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
3,349
I think it's a pretty balanced bill and from what I've seen so far and I'd support it at this point.

SUWA hates it, but there's no surprise there. They have no interest in compromising at all and are basing the amount of 'wilderness lost' on their Red Rock Proposal, which is very inflated and flawed to begin with.

It looks like it basically turns the existing WSA's into true wilderness....I support that.
It looks like it makes the rest of the Swell an NCA....I support that. Certainly a better option than a National Monument IMO.
It protects existing motorized routes and doesn't allow new ones to be created....I support that.
I'm not a fan of Goblin Valley expanding, but I'm willing to make a compromise there for the rest of the bill. It's not a huge area.

As far as transferring lands to the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration, it looks that that will just be a land swap of existing SITLA lands inside the new NCA and Wilderness areas for other federal lands elsewhere. That's typical in these situations and what was supposed to happen in the Bears Ears NM, too.

Don't fall for SUWA's bullshit and flawed arguments.
 

IntrepidXJ

ADVENTR
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
3,349
Reading that makes me even more confused about Utah politics and public lands, I thought UT politicians hated Wilderness and Monument designations or at least that is the impression following the Bear Ears fiasco :)

They just want to be involved in the decisions and process...not have it rammed down their throat....
 

SteveR

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Messages
468
I'm not familiar with most of the Swell, mainly just the Goblin-WildHorse-Crack area (but plan on changing that).
Looking at the (somewhat fuzzy) map of the proposed changes with reference to the Wildhorse and Crack areas- it appears that they at least partially fall into the new state park lands. We have random camped out that way numerous times. Assuming that state park designation will mean restrictions on that- will their be any thought put into where people will go, as it is a popular camping zone? A case of win some, lose some for the greater good, if the bill results in increased protection overall?
 

Udink

Relax, slip away...
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
1,482
That's why they are supporting it, they are trying to use this deal to get land back from the federal government. My understanding is that lands that are part of this state trust are used for extraction with the proceeds going to the state school system. It's hard to read the color coded map at the end of the article, but to me it looks like this proposal puts a huge chunk of the San Rafael Desert on the chopping block, opened up for mining/drilling.

Also, it's worth noting that proposed wilderness areas for the San Rafael Desert portion would all border this state owned extraction site. In other words the mineral extraction wouldn't be quarantined in some isolated area, it would be right smack in the middle of the surrounding wilderness.
I think you're reading a lot in to the bill and/or map that's just not there. The state is not getting "land back from the federal government," they're exchanging existing state lands within the new NCA and wilderness areas for federal lands that are NOT currently in an NCA, ACEC, or wilderness area. Environmentalists should see this as a huge gain, since the state can currently do whatever it wants with its own trust lands, but this will essentially shift those state trust lands outside of wilderness or other sensitive lands.

I can't tell which part of the San Rafael Desert you're referring to that is "on the chopping block." Part of the San Rafael Desert gets included in the NCA, other parts get designated wilderness. None of it will be newly opened up to mining/drilling (any more than it already is right now).
 

Udink

Relax, slip away...
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
1,482
I'm not familiar with most of the Swell, mainly just the Goblin-WildHorse-Crack area (but plan on changing that).
Looking at the (somewhat fuzzy) map of the proposed changes with reference to the Wildhorse and Crack areas- it appears that they at least partially fall into the new state park lands. We have random camped out that way numerous times. Assuming that state park designation will mean restrictions on that- will their be any thought put into where people will go, as it is a popular camping zone? A case of win some, lose some for the greater good, if the bill results in increased protection overall?
It basically looks like the state will gain control over nearly all the lands surrounding the San Rafael Reef and accompanying wilderness area, all the way from Temple Mountain to Muddy Creek. I really hate this idea. Here's what I predict will happen:
  • Almost all existing free, primitive camping will go away. The state will install fences and concrete fire rings and suddenly it'll be $15/night to camp anywhere in the region.
  • A fee will be charged for hiking (or maybe just parking near) Little Wild Horse Canyon and probably Bell, Ding, Dang, Crack, and Chute.
  • The crowds will be forced onto other nearby BLM lands due to the reduced camping opportunities in the newly expanded state park.
I don't really see this as having much benefit to the land or the general public, but the state will certainly reap the rewards.
 

ramblinman

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
100
@Udink thanks for that explanation. That certainly makes me feel better about this proposal. I think that what threw me off is that on the map the colors for the SITLA and NCA are similar shades of blue.
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
IntrepidXJ Arches and Canyonlands National Parks Accepting Comments on Proposed Fee Increases for Backcountry Operations General Discussion 38
BJett Cumberland Gap National Historical Park Backpacking 8
norwegianxplorer Mt Whitney Virtual Hike via Horseshoe Meadows & Mt Langley, Sequoia Kings Canyon National Park Backpacking 1
J A few days in Mojave National Preserve Dec. 5-7, 2020 Hiking & Camping 9
NorthwestWanderer Washingtons Okanogan National Forest : PCT/grass hopper pass Backpacking 7
scatman Cache Creek, Yellowstone National Park - September 10, 2020 Backpacking 8
norwegianxplorer Sequoia National Park just before the Creek Fire Backpacking 6
Stephanie B Fishing (for Trout) and Hunting (for Rock Art) In and Near Capitol Reef National Park Hiking & Camping 7
NorthwestWanderer The Bailey Range Traverse | An 8 Day Olympic National Park Epic Backpacking 15
scatman Pebble Creek, Yellowstone National Park - August 14, 2020 Backpacking 42
Janice Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore in Michigan's Upper Peninsula Backpacking 6
Janice Isle Royale National Park Backpacking 4
NorthwestWanderer Backpacking Okanogan National Forest : Copper Glance Lake & failed attempt at No Dice Lake Backpacking 2
norwegianxplorer Sequoia National Park, Backpacking Mt Silliman area, June 2020 Backpacking 8
ramblinman Boulder Creek Day Hike, Escalante National Monument Hiking & Camping 5
Rockskipper National Parks new social distancing posters General Discussion 6
UtahBrian Wondering When The National Parks Will Open General Discussion 13
J North Cascades National Park Black and Corteo Peaks Traverse Aug 21-23, 2007 Retro Backpacking 3
Mikjik86 FULL Video Part 2 Backpacking Glacier National Park "North Circle Route" Backpacking 0
Parma Let's See Your US National Parks Signs Photos Photography 19
Mikjik86 Backpacking Glacier National Park (Part 2 Preview) "North Circle Route" Montana, August 2019 Backpacking 2
Tim Valentine Pinnacles National Park Winter Hiking & Camping 10
E Glacier National Park in Mid July Trip Planning 0
Stephanie B Gold Butte National Monument, Nevada, February 11 - 15, 2020 Hiking & Camping 3
gnwatts Utah National Monuments, good & bad General Discussion 12
J Death Valley National Park Keene Canyon-Wonder Mine Loop. Dec. 3, 2019 Hiking & Camping 1
Mikjik86 Backpacking Glacier National Park August 2019 Backpacking 3
NorthwestWanderer Olympic National Park - Elk Mountain Hiking & Camping 7
westy Mojave National Preserve Hiking & Camping 9
Mikjik86 Backpacking Glacier National Park - North Circle Route Part 1 Preview Video. Backpacking 1
Stephanie B Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument - Kanab Area Hiking & Camping 2
Pianomover Trump administration Tuesday proposed allowing logging on more than half of Alaska’s 16.7 million-acre Tongass National Forest, the largest intact tem General Discussion 0
GarrettM Attempted Summit of El Capitan - Montana, Bitterroot National Forrest Backpacking 7
scatman Grebe Lake, Headwaters of Lava Creek and Observation Peak, Yellowstone National Park - September 13, 2019 Backpacking 7
chandlerwest Great Basin National Park - Wheeler Peak Hiking & Camping 13
BJett Mount Rogers National Recreation Area - Virginia Backpacking 18
IntrepidXJ It’s Time to End the National Park Service’s Arbitrary Ban on Street-Legal OHVs General Discussion 29
NorthwestWanderer 5 Day Olympic National Park On & Off trail expedition (6 bears) Backpacking 10
Stephanie B Capitol Reef National Park - First Real Visit Hiking & Camping 6
chandlerwest Glacier National Park - August 2019 Hiking & Camping 20
Yvonne Yellowstone 2018 - a solo trip hiking and exploring America's first National Park: Part II Madison Hiking & Camping 3
Yvonne Yellowstone 2018- A solo trip hiking and exploring America’s first National Park: Part I Mammoth Hiking & Camping 13
R 6 day Glacier National Park Trip August 6th-14th Advice Trip Planning 0
chandlerwest Glacier National Park -- June 2019 Hiking & Camping 15
NorthwestWanderer Backpacking Okanogan National Forest : Tiffany Mountain Backpacking 4
zionsky Fatality in Zion National Park General Discussion 1
scatman Grebe Lake - Yellowstone National Park - September Trip Planning 6
chandlerwest Continuing Adventures in Eastern Zion National Park Hiking & Camping 31
C Supreme Court ruling on Rivers in National Parks General Discussion 9
D Redwood Mountain Grove (Sequoia National Park) Trip Planning 1

Similar threads

Don't like ads? Become a BCP Supporting Member and kiss them all goodbye. Click here for more info.

Top