Jurassic National Monument and San Rafael Swell Conservation Area

Jackson

I ❤️ GYE
.
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
3,208
Has anyone heard much about this?

https://www.ksl.com/?sid=46317537&n...nal-monument-wilderness-areas-in-central-utah

Not sure what to to make of it. I'm tired of these designations putting certain areas on everyone's radar, but I guess a lot of the Swell remains fairly inaccessible regardless. I alsp can't help but wonder if there's an ulterior motive, although I do like that it involves some wilderness designations.
 
Reading that makes me even more confused about Utah politics and public lands, I thought UT politicians hated Wilderness and Monument designations or at least that is the impression following the Bear Ears fiasco :)
 
"The bill also would transfer nearly 100,000 acres to the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration. The agency manages the various parcels of state-owned lands throughout Utah as part of a trust to support various institutions in the state, including public schools."

That's why they are supporting it, they are trying to use this deal to get land back from the federal government. My understanding is that lands that are part of this state trust are used for extraction with the proceeds going to the state school system. It's hard to read the color coded map at the end of the article, but to me it looks like this proposal puts a huge chunk of the San Rafael Desert on the chopping block, opened up for mining/drilling.

Also, it's worth noting that proposed wilderness areas for the San Rafael Desert portion would all border this state owned extraction site. In other words the mineral extraction wouldn't be quarantined in some isolated area, it would be right smack in the middle of the surrounding wilderness.
 
Last edited:
I think it's a pretty balanced bill and from what I've seen so far and I'd support it at this point.

SUWA hates it, but there's no surprise there. They have no interest in compromising at all and are basing the amount of 'wilderness lost' on their Red Rock Proposal, which is very inflated and flawed to begin with.

It looks like it basically turns the existing WSA's into true wilderness....I support that.
It looks like it makes the rest of the Swell an NCA....I support that. Certainly a better option than a National Monument IMO.
It protects existing motorized routes and doesn't allow new ones to be created....I support that.
I'm not a fan of Goblin Valley expanding, but I'm willing to make a compromise there for the rest of the bill. It's not a huge area.

As far as transferring lands to the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration, it looks that that will just be a land swap of existing SITLA lands inside the new NCA and Wilderness areas for other federal lands elsewhere. That's typical in these situations and what was supposed to happen in the Bears Ears NM, too.

Don't fall for SUWA's bullshit and flawed arguments.
 
Reading that makes me even more confused about Utah politics and public lands, I thought UT politicians hated Wilderness and Monument designations or at least that is the impression following the Bear Ears fiasco :)

They just want to be involved in the decisions and process...not have it rammed down their throat....
 
I'm not familiar with most of the Swell, mainly just the Goblin-WildHorse-Crack area (but plan on changing that).
Looking at the (somewhat fuzzy) map of the proposed changes with reference to the Wildhorse and Crack areas- it appears that they at least partially fall into the new state park lands. We have random camped out that way numerous times. Assuming that state park designation will mean restrictions on that- will their be any thought put into where people will go, as it is a popular camping zone? A case of win some, lose some for the greater good, if the bill results in increased protection overall?
 
That's why they are supporting it, they are trying to use this deal to get land back from the federal government. My understanding is that lands that are part of this state trust are used for extraction with the proceeds going to the state school system. It's hard to read the color coded map at the end of the article, but to me it looks like this proposal puts a huge chunk of the San Rafael Desert on the chopping block, opened up for mining/drilling.

Also, it's worth noting that proposed wilderness areas for the San Rafael Desert portion would all border this state owned extraction site. In other words the mineral extraction wouldn't be quarantined in some isolated area, it would be right smack in the middle of the surrounding wilderness.
I think you're reading a lot in to the bill and/or map that's just not there. The state is not getting "land back from the federal government," they're exchanging existing state lands within the new NCA and wilderness areas for federal lands that are NOT currently in an NCA, ACEC, or wilderness area. Environmentalists should see this as a huge gain, since the state can currently do whatever it wants with its own trust lands, but this will essentially shift those state trust lands outside of wilderness or other sensitive lands.

I can't tell which part of the San Rafael Desert you're referring to that is "on the chopping block." Part of the San Rafael Desert gets included in the NCA, other parts get designated wilderness. None of it will be newly opened up to mining/drilling (any more than it already is right now).
 
I'm not familiar with most of the Swell, mainly just the Goblin-WildHorse-Crack area (but plan on changing that).
Looking at the (somewhat fuzzy) map of the proposed changes with reference to the Wildhorse and Crack areas- it appears that they at least partially fall into the new state park lands. We have random camped out that way numerous times. Assuming that state park designation will mean restrictions on that- will their be any thought put into where people will go, as it is a popular camping zone? A case of win some, lose some for the greater good, if the bill results in increased protection overall?
It basically looks like the state will gain control over nearly all the lands surrounding the San Rafael Reef and accompanying wilderness area, all the way from Temple Mountain to Muddy Creek. I really hate this idea. Here's what I predict will happen:
  • Almost all existing free, primitive camping will go away. The state will install fences and concrete fire rings and suddenly it'll be $15/night to camp anywhere in the region.
  • A fee will be charged for hiking (or maybe just parking near) Little Wild Horse Canyon and probably Bell, Ding, Dang, Crack, and Chute.
  • The crowds will be forced onto other nearby BLM lands due to the reduced camping opportunities in the newly expanded state park.
I don't really see this as having much benefit to the land or the general public, but the state will certainly reap the rewards.
 
@Udink thanks for that explanation. That certainly makes me feel better about this proposal. I think that what threw me off is that on the map the colors for the SITLA and NCA are similar shades of blue.
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
TheMountainRabbit News Release: Yellowstone National Park increases protection for bears and visitor safety by implementing changes to two bear management areas General Discussion 14
scatman The Gallatin River, Bighorn and Fawn Passes, Yellowstone National Park - September 7, 2023 Backpacking 14
futurafree government shutdown effects on national forests? General Discussion 21
BJett Packrafting the Obed National Wild & Scenic River - Tennessee On The Water 1
fossana New Baaj Nwaavjo I'tah Kukveni National Monument General Discussion 4
J York Fire, Mojave National Preserve. Aug 2023 Resource Discussions 3
Janice Field Trip - Washington Post podcast about national parks General Discussion 0
I Rescue Creek - Yellowstone National Park - June 3, 2023 Backpacking 15
scatman Rescue Creek - Yellowstone National Park - June 3, 2023 Backpacking 56
TractorDoc Cuyahoga Valley National Park (again!) 06/04/2023 Hiking & Camping 6
TractorDoc Cuyahoga Valley National Park 05/28/2023 Hiking & Camping 20
scatman Rescue Creek - Yellowstone National Park Meet Up (Members Only) 19
D Need suggestions -Beaverhead-Deerlodge National forrest, and Phillipsburg, MT Trip Planning 5
Ted California couple killed in Yosemite National Park rockslide identified by park officials General Discussion 0
NorthwestWanderer Backpacking Grand Teton National Park : Fossil Pass,Fox Creek Pass,Indian Lake,Alaska Basin,Hurricane Pass,Ice Floe Lake,& Snowdrift Lake Backpacking 19
fossana New National Monument planned in Southern NV General Discussion 3
canadug Hiker death in Zion National park :( Hiking & Camping 32
F Frontenac National Park, Quebec, Canada Hiking & Camping 2
J Mojave National Preserve Monsoon Aug. 3, 2022 Trip Planning 2
scatman Shoshone Lake Lollipop Loop - Yellowstone National Park - July 24, 2022 Backpacking 63
Absarokanaut Flooding in Yellowstone National Park and Adjacent Areas of Montana Today June 13, 2022 General Discussion 82
Dreamer El Yunque National Forest Hiking & Camping 3
Rockskipper pay-for-bot-scanning services for National Park campsites - interesting comments General Discussion 1
BJett Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area Packraft/Backpack Loop (TN) Backpacking 6
norwegianxplorer 7 days backpacking Breheimen/Glacier Home National Park in Norway Backpacking 2
pstm13 Rocky Mountain National Park Mid June with Kids Trip Planning 7
pstm13 Rocky Mountain National Park Mid June with Kids Trip Planning 0
Rockskipper Application Period Open For 2023 Private River Trips Through Grand Canyon National Park General Discussion 0
norwegianxplorer Backpacking SAREK NATIONAL PARK, Arctic Sweden, Camping Above RAPADALEN delta. Backpacking 7
balzaccom SAR in our national parks Trip Planning 8
S Mentasta Mountains, Wrangell St. Elias National Park and Preserve- family backpack Backpacking 1
Tim Valentine Point Reyes National Seashore December 2021 Hiking & Camping 14
scatman Grizzly Lake - Yellowstone National Park - September - 2022 Meet Up (Members Only) 149
norwegianxplorer Finding Hidden Glacier, 9 days backpacking Jotunheimen National Park Pt3, Norway. Trip Reports 0
P A short hike on the AT in Shenandoah National Park Hiking & Camping 0
norwegianxplorer Highest Mountain in Norway, Galdhøpiggen, the start of a 9 day backpacking trip in Jotunheimen national park Backpacking 0
norwegianxplorer 5 days Backpacking Rondane National Park, Norway Backpacking 3
norwegianxplorer Backpacking Norway, Femundsmarka National Park Pt 3, Grand Scandinavian Hiking & Backpacking Tour Ep4 Backpacking 0
scatman Gneiss Creek Part 2 - Yellowstone National Park - September 18, 2021 Hiking & Camping 0
norwegianxplorer Backpacking Rogen Nature Reserve, Sweden & Femundsmarka National Park, Norway Pt2 Backpacking 2
scatman Hayden Valley Loop - Yellowstone National Park - September 17, 2021 Hiking & Camping 34
scatman North Pitchstone Trail, Headwaters of Ouzel Creek, Bechler River and Mr. Bubbles(?) - Yellowstone National Park - September 13, 2021 Backpacking 36
norwegianxplorer 10 days Backpacking Femundsmarka National Park and Rogen Nature Reserve, Norway and Sweden Backpacking 8
scatman Gneiss Creek - Yellowstone National Park - September 8, 2021 Backpacking 20
TeamJenkins17 2022 Teton Wilderness/Shoshone National Forest Trip Trip Planning 0
fossana CA statewide National Forest closure through 17 Sep General Discussion 1
scatman Snake River Lollipop Loop - Yellowstone National Park - August 8, 2021 Backpacking 45
kansas Good map of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument? Trip Planning 5
chandlerwest Glacier National Park - June 2021 Hiking & Camping 8
J Death Valley National Park and Area Mountain Rambles Dec. 16-17, 2020 Hiking & Camping 0

Similar threads

Back
Top