radioradio
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2023
- Messages
- 8
I find myself with 12-14 or so days for a solo backpacking trip in early april. After a lot of research, I'm extremely intrigued by the escalante area. I've immersed myself in trip reports (thx Jamal Green, Amy & James, etc.) and I have copies of Canyoneering 3 and Rudi Lambrechtse's book.
This will be my first time hiking in this type of environment. I am from the northeast and have mostly done on trail travel for a few nights at a time. I have a limited amount of experience with bushwhacking and route finding using the caltopo app as well as map and compass. I also know myself to be on the sweatier side and I tend to require as much as a liter of water per hour with high exertion in the summer.
When hiking I tend to value the sense of accomplishment of doing something difficult, but enjoy the balance of easy miles here and there to restore confidence.
With that context, I'm trying to plan a trip that gives me options to push hard with enough bail out points (and food caches) so that I don't over-commit.
Initially, I was extremely intrigued by travel down the escalante river as it helped with my routefinding and water anxiety. However, reading through trip reports and talking to the rangers about the misery of bushwhacking, I'm having second thoughts.
The other option is to do a loop/figure 8 of some of the side canyons. (something like this Click here to view on CalTopo combining @Joey and @Bob's route with Amy & James from doingmiles.com's route).
I wonder if you guys have thoughts on this. Is it worth it to minimize the river travel at the risk of increasing water + route finding difficulty? If so, is the figure 8 I laid out the right choice? Are there other modifications you'd make or things to consider?
This will be my first time hiking in this type of environment. I am from the northeast and have mostly done on trail travel for a few nights at a time. I have a limited amount of experience with bushwhacking and route finding using the caltopo app as well as map and compass. I also know myself to be on the sweatier side and I tend to require as much as a liter of water per hour with high exertion in the summer.
When hiking I tend to value the sense of accomplishment of doing something difficult, but enjoy the balance of easy miles here and there to restore confidence.
With that context, I'm trying to plan a trip that gives me options to push hard with enough bail out points (and food caches) so that I don't over-commit.
Initially, I was extremely intrigued by travel down the escalante river as it helped with my routefinding and water anxiety. However, reading through trip reports and talking to the rangers about the misery of bushwhacking, I'm having second thoughts.
The other option is to do a loop/figure 8 of some of the side canyons. (something like this Click here to view on CalTopo combining @Joey and @Bob's route with Amy & James from doingmiles.com's route).
I wonder if you guys have thoughts on this. Is it worth it to minimize the river travel at the risk of increasing water + route finding difficulty? If so, is the figure 8 I laid out the right choice? Are there other modifications you'd make or things to consider?