I've never xc skiied before. I've seen skiis with skins on them for ascending hills. How do proper XC skiis compare to telemark skiis with skins on them?
I cross country skied for years. Then I got invited to work for room and board at a backcountry ski business in British Columbia, where I learned how to telemark. I agree with @
Nick it's way more fun than snowshoes. We would skin up all day, ski down in fresh powder all winter, every day. I've done a few winter camping trips on skis with a backpack too.
If you're just doing trails, you can use a more comfortable flexible boot, and skinnier, lighter skis. Waxless skis are easier, but won't be as much fun to go down if it's not very steep as the scales slow you. Waxable skis you have to find the right temperature wax and just rub it on at the trailhead or at home. Not too hard really. Skins, at least type with glue, wouldn't really work on waxless.
Now my wife and I telemark at our mom and pop ski area every weekend. It's how you survive in Montana! Because our kids love to downhill, I rarely do backcountry skiing for now. The more you get into telemarking, the heavier duty the boots, bindings and skis get. Now I use big plastic boots, a wider ski, and a cable binding that pushes the ball of your foot down more than a 3 pin or similar binding that would be used for trails. It is a fairly steep learning curve for most to learn telemarking, but has been great for me.
When you skin up you can almost go as many places as snowshoeing. You can get a heel lifter that makes it easier to go very steeply up, my bindings include that. There is nothing better than gliding through fresh powder in a remote backcountry area as @
baltocharlie said. You do have to be educated about and equipped for avalanche danger if you get near 30 degree slopes and more anywhere.