2P Backpacking Tent Recommendation
- Thread starter bkdraft62
- Start date
RyanP
Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2015
- Messages
- 633
Depends completely on your particular situation:
- Is this for two large people, or for one person mostly?
- For areas exposed to wind, or areas with natural protection from the elements?
- For established campsites, or off-trail campsites?
- For the desert, mountains, or forest?
- For trips with short hiking and lots of time around camp, or trips with long hiking and minimal time around camp?
- For buggy areas, or mostly non-buggy areas?
- Do you hike with trekking poles?
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2019
- Messages
- 149
From the outdoor gear websites, the REI Half Dome 2P tent appears to get very good reviews and costs around $300. REI tents are generally highly regarded, for their price.
Unfortunately, these days, this is at the 'budget' end for quality tents, and so there will be some compromises, mainly weight related. For example, the Big Agnes Copper Spur 2P tent (which I use) weighs 3lb 2oz, compared to the Half Dome, which weighs 4lb 12 oz. On the flip side, the fabrics used on the heavier tent are probably more robust and potentially longer lasting.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,370
I have some nights in my friend's X-Mid 2 and he replaced it last year with the X-Mid Pro 2. We have used it for a couple of trips this year.
I do like Durston, good headroom, both sitting and laying down, solid construction, not too hard to pitch. The vestibule is a little narrow.
For the Pro 2, I do not think it is worth it.
I griped about this somewhere on here previously. You only get 48" of width, instead of 52". For some, this is not a big deal, and you can say that at 52" you are inevitably going to wake up face to face with your tentmate- for good or bad- or almost spooning with them... BUT, if you have a pad that is 25", which is 1000x better than a 20 or 22" pad, then you do not fit in 48" (simple math of 2x25").
I don't know why Durston short-changed the Pro when the Pro material is lighter and the width wouldn't cost much weight (I think it was to shave cost).
One solution in the Pro 2, is having mummy-shaped pads and sleeping staggered, which puts one person's shoulders even with the trekking pole, knocking into them when you move, and right in the fart zone, which is worse than waking up face to face. The whole idea that you could solve it by sleeping head to foot is ludicrous in 80% of backcountry campsites where you are almost always on some kind of slope and need to face the same direction. If you are talking desert, Cascades, Tetons, etc... where I have slept in the Durston, you could spend all week trying to find a campsite that is level enough for sleeping head to foot.
Rant over... I do wish my friend had not traded the X-Mid 2 for the Pro.
I have also used the Stratospire 2. It is 52" wide and a good tent. We got rained on in the desert with high winds and it was fine.
I think many of the tents mentioned here are all good and depend on what you prefer.
When I am not taking a bear canister or when I know I have a little more space to setup, then I use my MLD SuperMid. For 2 people it is a palace. It is even better in winter on snow- but it is more than $300.
Thank you for that input on the Durston! I had not heard of the Tarptents before, and I like some of the features of the Double Rainbow DW. A little more than $300 though. such hard decisions, I can see how someone might get to many tents!
I Think I'm taking the Nemo off the list, between the 3 of them, it weighs the most, and has the smallest floor space (though has some nice end-to-end headspace).
The question is, are those neat features worth an extra $100? I like the double open fly that looks like an awning, just not sure how practical that is and if I would use it. I also like how the side comes up higher off the ground. Weight the 2 are pretty close to the same. Tarptent is slightly smaller inside, by a few inches. It's also shorter by 5"...But the Durston is a Treking Pole tent, and I don't have Treking Poles, so that will be extra cost...decisions decisions!
I Think I'm taking the Nemo off the list, between the 3 of them, it weighs the most, and has the smallest floor space (though has some nice end-to-end headspace).
The question is, are those neat features worth an extra $100? I like the double open fly that looks like an awning, just not sure how practical that is and if I would use it. I also like how the side comes up higher off the ground. Weight the 2 are pretty close to the same. Tarptent is slightly smaller inside, by a few inches. It's also shorter by 5"...But the Durston is a Treking Pole tent, and I don't have Treking Poles, so that will be extra cost...decisions decisions!
I did think of that. Most of my camping won't be hard core backpacking, probably light backpacking or site camping. I just want the option for something lighter in case.
I'm torn on the treking poles VS the regular tent poles. I've never used treking poles, let alone for a tent. Any feedback one way or the other on one VS the other?
UPDATE ALSO: I did trade emails with Durston (Dan emailed back) and also with Tarptent. Both tents are attractive to me for different reasons.
OldBill
Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2015
- Messages
- 496
If you've never used them and are happy with your routine then carry poles. Like many, I always use poles to protect my knees especially on steep down climbs. Only disadvantage of not having extra tent poles is if setting up a base camp - you're forced to take tent down or leave poles.
James and Amy
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2021
- Messages
- 45
One thing to consider concerning tent poles versus treking poles: do you want a fully free standing tent or not? Good free standing tents like the Big Agnes can be set up on hard surfaces such as stone slabs (or paved surfaces) without using stakes. They are slightly floppy but work under most conditions. Sometimes piles of stones can replace stakes, but we have camped in places where there were no useable stones and a non-free standing tent/tarp would not have worked. For us, the extra weight of a free standing tent is worth it given where we sometimes camp; for other folks, it does not matter.
Another thing to consider is that a well designed free standing tent is easy to set up under adverse conditions: wind, rain, etc. It takes learned skill to set up a tarp tent securely using treking poles, so it you get one, learn how to set it up robustly at home before you head out.
Finally, we would never travel with a shelter that does not have a bathtub floor. Conditions can change at night and several times we would have been flooded out without that floor. Once we were camped alongside a shallow fresh water stream in Scotland. Although we were twenty miles from the coast, the stream was tidal and after settling in, we noticed water rising around us at a rapid rate. We evacuated quickly and stayed dry only because the bathtub floor prevented water ingress. We felt foolish afterwards, but never considered that the stream could be affected by tides so far away.
James and Amy
Another thing to consider is that a well designed free standing tent is easy to set up under adverse conditions: wind, rain, etc. It takes learned skill to set up a tarp tent securely using treking poles, so it you get one, learn how to set it up robustly at home before you head out.
Finally, we would never travel with a shelter that does not have a bathtub floor. Conditions can change at night and several times we would have been flooded out without that floor. Once we were camped alongside a shallow fresh water stream in Scotland. Although we were twenty miles from the coast, the stream was tidal and after settling in, we noticed water rising around us at a rapid rate. We evacuated quickly and stayed dry only because the bathtub floor prevented water ingress. We felt foolish afterwards, but never considered that the stream could be affected by tides so far away.
James and Amy
OldBill
Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2015
- Messages
- 496
Reviving this thread, even though this is for a 1p. Getting ready to pull the trigger on a X-Mid 1p solid. Wanted to get feedback & experience from other X-Mid users. Primary use is shoulder season trips, including WY/GYE etc in September. I ruled out Dyneema/DCF (price, gets damaged by hail). Wanted:
TT Dipole DW - great vents, more space sleeping, less usable sitting area than X-Mid
TT Moment DW - 39" peak and 20" ends = too small for me
TT Stratospire DW - most wind-worthy by most accounts. low ceiling at ends. ~37 oz seam sealed
DD X-Mid 1 v2 - by most accounts a reasonable choice, less width at head and foot than Dipole
Slingfin Portal 1p - freestanding, known to handle wind well, $500 and 2.5 lb ruled it out
All trekking pole tents had comments about being "fussy" to pitch, with the Moment considered the easiest. Geometry has to be perfect for a tight pitch. Always seems to be rock right under where that stake "has" to go and few sites are level. Adding extra guyline helps, but that might alter a critical angle (especially for pitchlocks). Moment has smallest footprint, the rest are about equal in total area.
- > 41" height (top of head is 39" on a 3" mat), at least 32" wide inner
- double wall (hate getting wet and having it freeze come morning) (can still happen, but much less)
- can handle high winds above tree line, pitching in off-trail sites
- 2 lb or less, trekking pole (always use)
TT Dipole DW - great vents, more space sleeping, less usable sitting area than X-Mid
TT Moment DW - 39" peak and 20" ends = too small for me
TT Stratospire DW - most wind-worthy by most accounts. low ceiling at ends. ~37 oz seam sealed
DD X-Mid 1 v2 - by most accounts a reasonable choice, less width at head and foot than Dipole
Slingfin Portal 1p - freestanding, known to handle wind well, $500 and 2.5 lb ruled it out
All trekking pole tents had comments about being "fussy" to pitch, with the Moment considered the easiest. Geometry has to be perfect for a tight pitch. Always seems to be rock right under where that stake "has" to go and few sites are level. Adding extra guyline helps, but that might alter a critical angle (especially for pitchlocks). Moment has smallest footprint, the rest are about equal in total area.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2020
- Messages
- 506
I've only ever used the DCF versions, but my X-Mid Pro has become my favorite tent in the "quiver". I borrowed a friend's 2p for a couple trips in 2022 to try it out and got the 1p for myself early last year. I'll happily endorse Durston's quality and simplicity, in general - but I also know the polyester tents differ from the ones I've used. (Have heard good things though!)
OldBill
Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2015
- Messages
- 496
Do you have the DCF or double wall version? Got close to buying yesterday but found a few videos and threads about the inner being cramped. Even version 2 (32" max width). Might be a problem with a bit of claustrophobia and a solid inner. But, likely better in winds than my Trekker. Have a trip through Bear Basin with @Bob planned so it'll be exposed camps.
- Joined
- May 16, 2016
- Messages
- 1,360
The original SilPoly with the inner bug net. I don't find it spacious, but it is not cramped. I'm 5'11 & 170# so not huge. My 6'4 230 brother in law would hate it
